Engagements

Scope follows the money at risk.

A £40,000 commitment deserves more than a £250 report. A £3,000 trial order should not pay for a group structure map.

Indicative fees

Verification report£250
Corporate & control structure£600–900
Site visit, all-in£1,200
Qualification programme£3,500–6,000
Market & supplier landscape£2,500–6,000
Transaction diligence£8,000–15,000
Monthly retainer£1,200–2,500

Verification reports can be ordered online. Everything larger is scoped and quoted first, and expenses are never billed on top of a site visit fee.

Where the exposure is material

Four engagements for transactions

Corporate & Control Structure Review

£600–900Five working days

Every connected entity mapped: who holds the licence, who signs, who invoices, who receives payment. Every mismatch is flagged. Includes equity pledges and frozen equity, which are publicly filed and almost never checked.

Commission this when the counterparty is part of a group, the invoicing entity differs from the operating entity, the order exceeds £30,000, or you are about to sign an exclusive.

Site Visit Report

£1,200Flat, anywhere in mainland China

One fee including all China domestic travel. We are based in China, so there is no travel window to wait for and no expense line afterwards. You receive what was seen, what was refused, and the host’s statements set against documentary evidence.

How it works: you commission us, the supplier hosts us. Agreed in writing beforehand, a member of their team present throughout, kept to the areas they have agreed.

Supplier Qualification Programme

£3,500–6,000Four to six weeks

You have three to five candidates and need to choose. Desk verification across all of them, site visits to the two strongest, then a recommendation setting out what each one gives you at the negotiating table.

Supply Chain Diligence for a Transaction

£8,000–15,000Scoped per deal

Supplier concentration, undisclosed related-party supply, the legal standing of the counterparties the target depends on, and the contractual exposure if one of them fails. Delivered to the format and timetable your deal team works to.

On using a Big Four firm instead: a workstream this size sits below their engagement threshold, and they would staff it with juniors outside China.

What a structure review delivers

Four entities. One of them is the one you think you are dealing with.

Group structure map showing four entities and which one holds the licence, signs, invoices and receives payment Controlling individual 70% · also controls two further entities Entity A The factory youvisited LICENCE manufacturing scope Entity B Signs thecontract SIGNS trading scope only Entity C Receives yourpayment INVOICES · PAID 2 enforcement cases Entity D The facility in thevideo call unrelated owner no link found MISMATCH — the licence, the signature and the money sit in three different companies What this changes Contract with Entity B and you have no claim against the factory. Pay Entity C and two creditors are ahead of you. Inspect Entity D and you have inspected a company you are not buying from. ILLUSTRATIVE COMPOSITE · THE MAP DELIVERED IN A CORPORATE & CONTROL STRUCTURE REVIEW

Why not the alternatives

There are four ways to get this done. Here is where each one stops.

ApproachWhat it gives youWhere it stops
Online verification platformsRegistry data pulled from official databases, fast and cheapData without interpretation. No view on whether a finding matters for your deal, and nobody accountable for the conclusion.
Local inspection agenciesSomeone physically at the factory, low day ratesQuality systems only. They do not read corporate filings or form a legal-commercial judgement, and recourse against them from the UK is theoretical.
Big Four advisoryFull methodology, insurance, brand comfortA workstream of this size sits below their engagement threshold. Commission one and it is staffed by juniors, usually from outside China.
Plumbline ChinaFilings read in Chinese, a judgement formed by the person who signs, an English law contract with a stated liability position, and site visits without a travel windowWe do not test products, audit labour conditions, or work in politically sensitive regions. Those we refer on.

The Big Four comparison reflects our principal’s own experience as a management consultant at PwC.

Before you commission

The six questions we are asked most

Is this legal, given China’s 2026 restrictions?

Reading public corporate and court filings is a commercial credit check, which Decree 834 leaves expressly permitted. Site visits are invited in writing and hosted by the supplier. What the rules restrict is intrusive verification, unsupervised worker interviews and uncontrolled photography, and we do none of those. The full position is set out under Operating in China.

What if you find nothing wrong?

Then the verdict is Proceed, and that is a useful answer. A clean report tells you the counterparty is who they say they are, licensed for what they are selling you, and solvent enough to be worth contracting with. Most reports are not dramatic. The ones that are, pay for all the others.

Can I use the report in a dispute or with insurers?

It is evidence of what the public record showed on the date we read it, and it names the sources. That is often enough to show you took reasonable steps before paying. It is not a legal opinion and does not substitute for one. If you are already in a dispute, tell us before we start so the scope is set accordingly.

How is this different from a £30 online company check?

Those return raw registry fields, usually machine translated, with no view on what any of it means for your order. You get a judgement from someone who reads the originals and signs the conclusion, plus two checks no automated service runs: whether the bank account you have been asked to pay belongs to the counterparty, and whether their certificate numbers exist in the issuing body’s register.

What do you need from me to start?

The counterparty’s name, in Chinese if you have it, and roughly what you are about to commit. If you have a proforma invoice, a business licence copy or certificates they have sent you, send those too. Nothing else is required, and a verification report is back inside 48 hours.

What do you not cover?

Product quality testing, production capacity verification, labour conditions auditing, and anything touching politically sensitive regions. Audited financial statements are not available for private Chinese companies and we do not imply otherwise. Where you need work we decline, we will say so and point you to someone who does it.

Entry and ongoing

Smaller commitments, and buyers running several suppliers

Supplier Verification Report

£25048 hours · two pages

Seven checks plus certificate verification, ending in a verdict. Most clients start here with the supplier they are least sure about.

Not included: product quality, production capacity, working conditions, audited financials.

Market & Supplier Landscape

£2,500–6,000Three to five weeks

Who is actually licensed to do this in China, how many of them there are, how large they are on their own filings, who controls them, and which have been sued by their customers. Built from the registry upwards.

Embedded Support

£1,200–2,500Per month

Unlimited desk verification, supplier correspondence handled in Chinese, and one site visit or hosted video walkthrough each month. Bilingual document review at £0.15 per word.